The Tie Research

GMX: Comparative Valuation of DeFi Perp Trading

By Jack Melnick
April 18, 2023

  1. Low liquidity 
  2. Unfair pricing – for buyers and/or writers 
  3. Lack of composability 
  4. Lack of user adoption 
  5. Lack of protocol adoption 
  6. Arbitrage opportunities during times of high volatility
  1. Bots front-running user trades (that’s why there’s protection built into GLP)
  2. Difficulty of maintaining the dollar peg of USDG
  3. Providing farm tokens, without any use cases or incentives other than accumulating or selling
  1. Given its fee pass-through, GMX behaves very differently than governance tokens like dYdX. We selected TradFi companies including CME, CBOE, and Nasdaq as comps for the business. The mean multiple for these businesses is ~21x EV/Forward EBITDA, which we then take as a projected multiple for GMX. 
  2. Trading Volume and Fee Volume have been averaging 15-20% growth week/week over the past 31 weeks. We used a much more conservative assumption of 5-6% average growth w/w over the next 1-2 years. 
  1. Team Execution on stated roadmap
  2. Continued growth of Partnerships
  3. Sustained growth at 5-6% w/w for the next year
  4. Oracle Exploit Risk
  5. Market realization of mispricing relative to TradFi and DeFi peers

Stay up to date

Sign up to receive an email when we release a new post


Jack Melnick

Jack Melnick

Jack Melnick, Author at The Tie

VP of Research
See Additional Posts By Jack